Using standard positive resist and image reversal you can get little or no
undercut and total control of your dimensions down to 800 Angstrom lines and
spaces. Bill Moffat
-----Original Message-----
From: William Lanford-Crick [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 9:30 AM
To: General MEMS discussion
Subject: Re: [mems-talk] MicroChem LOR Lift-off resist
Hi,
We use 1813 resist to image LOR 5B, and develop with 319 developer (which etched
LOR 5B). Undercut can be very fast (maybe 1 um for 10 seconds over-etch) but we
found that increasing the bake time for the LOR helps the problem. Currently I
bake LOR 5B at 200 deg C. for 10 Minutes.
-Bill
> Does anyone have any experience using LOR with Shipley 1800 series as the
>imaging resist for lift-off metallization? I have been evaluating the LOR B
>resist and find that the undercut rates I get are much higher (up to 4
>times) than that shown in the datasheet. I have been using exactly the same
>processing conditions as specified but can't reproduce the rates that are
>shown in the datasheet.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list: to unsubscribe or change your list
options, visit http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/mems-talk
Hosted by the MEMS Exchange, providers of MEMS processing services.
Visit us at http://www.memsnet.org/