A MEMS Clearinghouse® and information portal
for the MEMS and Nanotechnology community
RegisterSign-In
MEMSnet Home About Us What is MEMS? Beginner's Guide Discussion Groups Advertise Here
News
MEMSnet Home: MEMS-Talk: removal of HMDS without affecting the photoresist
removal of HMDS without affecting the photoresist
2010-10-20
Mikael Evander
2010-10-21
Jesse D Fowler
2010-10-21
Gareth Jenkins
2010-10-21
David Casale
2010-10-22
Mikael Evander
2010-10-21
Shay Kaplan
2010-10-21
Bill Flounders
2010-10-26
Bill Moffat
removal of HMDS without affecting the photoresist
Mikael Evander
2010-10-22
Thanks all, plasma seems to be the easiest and most obvious way for now. Should
have thought of that. I'll try skipping the HMDS next time and see what happens
:)

thanks again


/Mikael

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Casale" 
To: "General MEMS discussion" 
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 9:06:33 AM
Subject: Re: [mems-talk] removal of HMDS without affecting the photoresist

I agree with Gareth, just skip the HMDS prime. You really shouldn't need
it on the glass. I wouldn't even worry about the dehydration step he
said, if you are using a standard positive DNQ resist (like S1800),
adhesion and wettability to glass should be fine and I don't think the
small amount of water vapor in the glass is going to affect much. 95% of
our work is on standard soda lime glass, and we rarely use HMDS.

Sincerely,
David Casale
reply
Events
Glossary
Materials
Links
MEMS-talk
Terms of Use | Contact Us | Search
MEMS Exchange
MEMS Industry Group
Coventor
Harrick Plasma
Tanner EDA
MEMS Technology Review
Tanner EDA by Mentor Graphics
Addison Engineering
Mentor Graphics Corporation