A MEMS Clearinghouse® and information portal
for the MEMS and Nanotechnology community
RegisterSign-In
MEMSnet Home About Us What is MEMS? Beginner's Guide Discussion Groups Advertise Here
News
MEMSnet Home: MEMS-Talk: SU-8 3000 vs 2000 adhesion
SU-8 3000 vs 2000 adhesion
2010-12-11
Mikael Evander
2010-12-11
Bill Moffat
2010-12-12
Mikael Evander
2010-12-12
Andrew Sarangan
2010-12-12
Gareth Jenkins
2010-12-13
Bill Moffat
2010-12-13
Bill Moffat
2010-12-13
Yifan Wu
2010-12-15
Adrian Papas
2011-01-28
Mikael Evander
2011-01-28
Andrew Sarangan
2011-01-28
Mikael Evander
2011-01-28
Andrew Sarangan
2011-01-28
Dietrich Lueerssen
SU-8 3000 vs 2000 adhesion
Gareth Jenkins
2010-12-12
I have also read that HMDS can make adhesion worse if any moisture gets
involved.

As for glass, I have only every tried the standard formulation. I could get
good adhesion (without HMDS) but it wasn't easy.
I too would be interested in finding out more about the 2000 &
3000 formulations. Does anyone know what solvents they actually use?


On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 05:15, Andrew Sarangan  wrote:

> I have also noticed some detrimental effects of HMDS on SU8. What has
> worked for me is an etch clean of the wafer, vacuum bake and then
> quickly spin the SU8 while the wafer is still warm. The soft and post
> bake have to be ramped very slowly, about 5C every 2 mins.
reply
Events
Glossary
Materials
Links
MEMS-talk
Terms of Use | Contact Us | Search
MEMS Exchange
MEMS Industry Group
Coventor
Harrick Plasma
Tanner EDA
Addison Engineering
MEMStaff Inc.
MEMS Technology Review
Tanner EDA by Mentor Graphics