A MEMS Clearinghouse® and information portal
for the MEMS and Nanotechnology community
RegisterSign-In
MEMSnet Home About Us What is MEMS? Beginner's Guide Discussion Groups Advertise Here
News
MEMSnet Home: MEMS-Talk: SU-8 3000 vs 2000 adhesion
SU-8 3000 vs 2000 adhesion
2010-12-11
Mikael Evander
2010-12-11
Bill Moffat
2010-12-12
Mikael Evander
2010-12-12
Andrew Sarangan
2010-12-12
Gareth Jenkins
2010-12-13
Bill Moffat
2010-12-13
Bill Moffat
2010-12-13
Yifan Wu
2010-12-15
Adrian Papas
2011-01-28
Mikael Evander
2011-01-28
Andrew Sarangan
2011-01-28
Mikael Evander
2011-01-28
Andrew Sarangan
2011-01-28
Dietrich Lueerssen
SU-8 3000 vs 2000 adhesion
Andrew Sarangan
2011-01-28
I should have added that I was talking about the older SU-2000 series
resist. The 3000 may behave differently.


On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Mikael Evander  wrote:
> So I'm not saying you are wrong, but I keep hearing this about the HMDS while
MicroChem keeps stating that it does help and have released a document with
measurements showing an almost 100% increase in adhesion for the 3000
formulation: http://www.microchem.com/products/pdf/SU-8-Adhesion-Results.pdf
>
> Is the general opinion that the data from Microchem can't be trusted, are
there other studies showing the opposite or why do people seem to ignore this?
>
> best regards
>
> Mikael
reply
Events
Glossary
Materials
Links
MEMS-talk
Terms of Use | Contact Us | Search
MEMS Exchange
MEMS Industry Group
Coventor
Harrick Plasma
Tanner EDA
Nano-Master, Inc.
Process Variations in Microsystems Manufacturing
Mentor Graphics Corporation
MEMS Technology Review